A professionals appauling aproach to historic child abuse in the UK
I was horrified to read an article in the Guardian online. This will give us an insight not only into the ignorance of this woman whos a supposed professional but her attempt to undermine historic child abuse survivors is a disgusting stance to take. When I read this article it was the terms used that made me feel sick so please take time to read the article and let me know what you think ......
I found the author of this article bitter and as much as I read it and re-read it, it wreaked of a bitter women whom had no respect for historic abuse and I would like to point out that since when did a professional feel this an apropriate way to speak to any person when it comes to chld abuse no matter and quote
Quote = When Roger reiterated his worries, I questioned him further about the nature of the word "abuse". "What exactly do you mean by abuse, Roger?" I asked. "Were you sworn at, beaten, threatened, shagged or buggered?" = end quote
I am horrified to see Fay Wertheimer use such terms when aproaching the subject of child abuse. Is this a professional evaluation and is this the terminology now used for rape and sexual abuse to be shagged or buggered? I’m appauled at this article
http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,,1958945,00.html
Comments
- No comments yet - be the first!
Add a comment
Next entry: Church sets aside millions for child abuse claims
Previous entry: Foster Parents convicted for appauling child abuse