To Abuse or Not to Abuse - The Systematic Negative Conditioning of Children by Social Services
What do we do about child abuse within the system?
It is with increasing concern that I write this article . How can a Government be aware of child abuse within the system yet fail to do anything about it? I have never been into conspiracies but I am seeing more and more evidence of systematic child abuse within the system. These include the drugging of girls at Kendal house, the sexual and physical abuse of children in care homes in Staffordshire, Wales and Ireland, to name just a few. The abuse of children in foster care more recently the baby who died and had 13 broken ribs yet they are protected and not prosecuted contrary to what they do to the natural parents.
Alongside this I am increasingly concerned about the paedophile rings that seem to be included in some of this abuse.
I have thought about these cases extensively and the only reason I keep coming up with (and have seen research and blogs that seem to reflect the same) is the serious concern that some members both high profile and members of the Government are involved in direct child abuse itself.
Some I have seen are believed to be linked to paedophile rings .Where does all this leave our children.?
The government fails to protect them, the church has in many cases actually abused them and Campaign groups and Organisations are doing their very best to expose the abuses of children but then the likes of the DCSF and MPs actually ignore it. Why?
Parents are having children removed by Social Services in many cases not because they have harmed them but because of a chance they may be harmed in the future, thought up by a Social Worker. The common theme in this is to protect from possible emotional harm and with no evidence to back this up and after attending the Channel 4 not so public debate those in positions of trust and authority weren’t able to define emotional abuse. Some of these parents then have to sit back while the children who are now in local authority care are then abused within the system either physically, emotionally or sexually.
Social Services are decreasing child/ parent contact with almost every parent I have spoken too and yet one Social Services are allowing adopted parents to continue to see two adopted girls that were sexually abused by the Adopted parents paedophile friends (they men have since pleaded guilty to the abuse) in the Manchester area.
So when natural parents, despite the fact that the parent has never hurt the child and also very often against the child’s wishes are not allowed any contact for abuse they haven’t commited and emotional abuse that parents can’t prove because it doesn’t have any defination in law. Social Services have seen anything from as little as a child truenting when bullied at school yet the parent is blamed and not the schools inability to deal with the school bullies, too many sweets and various other made up abuses which are then misused against parents and used as emotional abuse. Then there are parents whom are wrongly accused after misdiagnoses by doctors and they never see their children again as adoption cant be reversed.
I am sorry but this to me also points to the fact there are deliberate cover ups within the system when Social Workers and professionals get it wrong and rather than admit to their errors they cover them up damaging children and families for fear that something may be disclosed on their incompitence.
This is not only cruel to the parent but more so cruel to the child and I would go as far to say that I believe this is done by Social Services as a form of control over the child. Like a brainwashing exercise done deliberately to alienate the child from its family and thus create a controlled system that doesn’t work and only creates children who are then irreversibly damaged within the system.
Is this not emotional abuse?
A Daily Telegraph article on emotion abuse reads
“35,000 children who are taken into care every year on the recommendation of social workers, a large proportion are removed on grounds of “emotional abuse” – a category so broad and ill-defined that it can include both praising your children too much and not praising them enough, or feeding them too many vegetables or too little fresh fruit. It appears that social workers, aware of their inability to intervene in cases where children really are at risk, compensate for that failure by intervening in families where they are obviously safe”
Is this done to prepare them and programme them for some other form of planned systematic abuse within the system as children are undoubtedly abused within it and have been for decades as proven.
If they have control over the child emotionally then it is easier for someone to have control over the child physically or sexually with no fear of the child disclosing anything . Then if that child’s contact with their parents is more or less cut off that child therefore then has no one left who they could turn to and speak out.
The common theme also with Social Services of late is to split parents up by turning one against the other.
Divide and Conquer ! If Social Services can turn parents against each other within care proceedings it makes their job easier to win cases. This is another widespread used tactic up and down the UK.
This must be in there training manual.
1.Visit family if no abuse suspected invent some.
2.Split the family up wherever possible. Make mothers and fathers split up. Place children apart if possible
3.Start to decrease contact till if at all possible ( if you can get away with it by law) its zero
4.Lie, fabricate evidence in court. Whatever it takes to secure a win.
5.When case won continue with brainwashing of children.
6.Ignore child’s views wherever possible. This increases your control over them and their dependence on the system.
I’m sorry but I accuse Social Services of grooming children in the same way paedophiles do !!!!!